corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15346

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Tanne JH.
US justice department sues company for off-label promotion of antidepressants for children.
BMJ 2009 Mar 25; 338:b1222:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/mar25_3/b1222?papetoc


Abstract:

The United States Department of Justice filed a civil complaint last month against Forest Laboratories in a district court in Massachusetts, alleging that the company violated the federal False Claims Act.

The department’s complaint says that the company marketed its antidepressants citalopram (marketed in the US as Celexa) and escitalopram oxalate (Lexapro) for use in children when the drugs were not approved for such use, that the company paid inducements to doctors to promote use of the drugs in children, that the company failed to disclose a study showing that Celexa was not effective in children, and that the government was defrauded of millions of dollars because federal health insurance programmes such as Medicaid paid for prescriptions for the drugs that were not covered by off-label paediatric use.

Under the statute, the justice department says, “the government can recover treble damages and $5500 [£3800; 4000] to $11 000 for each . . .

Keywords:
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use* Child Citalopram/therapeutic use* Drug Approval Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence* Humans Massachusetts

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963