corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15226

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Watson R.
Organisations question EC changes on drug information for patients
BMJ 2009 Mar 4; 338:(7694):b894
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/mar04_1/b894


Abstract:

Medical and consumer organisations are raising concerns about plans by the European Commission to allow drug companies to provide information on prescription only drugs directly to the public. The drug industry is also questioning how the system would work in practice.

The initial reactions to measures that would allow drug companies to supply factual information on prescription only drugs to the public emerged last week at a conference in Brussels organised by the European Commission and the Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs.

The draft legislation, tabled last December, covers the type of information that may be given; the channels through which it may be supplied; the quality criteria and conditions to be met; the monitoring mechanisms to be put in place; and the sanctions to be applied in cases of non-compliance.

The conference was the first major opportunity for different groups to present their views in the same forum. . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963