corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15220

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Miller N.
Apology for misleading drug claims
WA Today (Western Australia) 2009 Mar 4
http://www.watoday.com.au/national/apology-for-misleading-drug-claims-20090304-8oii.html


Full text:

A BIG drug company has mailed an apology to all Australian doctors after being caught out making misleading claims about a controversial new anti-depressant.

Duloxetine, sold as Cymbalta, went on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme last July despite official warnings linking it to suicide and liver damage. It has been prescribed more than 82,000 times since, 23,000 in Victoria alone.

A Medicines Australia review has found that Eli Lilly made a “concerted effort” at the time of the PBS listing to spruik “off-label” use of the drug at up to twice the approved dose, as a treatment for physical pain associated with depression.

Companies are not legally allowed to promote drugs for off-label use when there is not enough clinical proof that the treatment works as advertised.

Eli Lilly has a recent track record of off-label promotion.

In January in the US, the company agreed to pay a $US1.42 billion settlement over its marketing of the anti-psychotic drug Zyprexa after pleading guilty to a federal misdemeanour.

The Medicines Australia review found the evidence of a pain relief effect would “enliven a debate in a medical setting”, but did not support the use of Cymbalta as a treatment for physical pain associated with depression. The company was fined $100,000 and ordered to withdraw all promotional material making the claims.

Eli Lilly’s appeal against the decision, saying the material was “educational” rather than promotional, was dismissed.

In a letter to doctors dated February 20, the company apologised for “any unintentional confusion” over the marketing of Cymbalta. It admitted the marketing material might have been misleading, and might have suggested using a higher than appropriate dose of the drug. The Age understands that the letter was prompted by further complaints to the company about its earlier promotion. Eli Lilly was unable to respond to further questions from The Age by deadline yesterday.

Cymbalta has been controversial since it was first approved for use in the US.

The FDA has warned that Cymbalta users “may be more likely to think about killing themselves or actually try to do so, especially when Cymbalta is first started or the dose is changed”.

It also warned that Cymbalta might cause liver damage, and users must not drink alcohol.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909