corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15117

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Sealover E.
Panel buries drug ethics bill
Rocking Mountain News 2009 Feb 19
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2009/feb/19/panel-buries-drug-ethics-bill/


Abstract:

Proposal would have regulated firms’ marketing


Full text:

The most comprehensive pharmaceutical reform bill in America died on a 6-1 vote by a state Senate panel Wednesday.

Sen. Morgan Carroll’s Prescription Drug Ethics Act sought to ban drug companies from giving gifts to doctors or reselling patient prescription information for marketing purposes.

It also would have required disclosure of drug companies’ advertising and marketing budgets and prohibited persons with financial interests with drug firms from participating in hospitals’ or doctors’ decisions to buy the drugs.

Carroll and her supporters said at least 1.5 million people a year are harmed nationally by medication errors and contended the bill would have required prescriptions to be more evidence-based.

The Aurora Democrat said Senate Bill 166 was needed to increase patient safety and bring down soaring health care costs.

She said drug makers’ inordinate influence on medical professionals is pushing untested products onto the markets and persuading doctors to prescribe high-cost medicines rather than those that patients need.

But drug and bioscience companies argued that the restrictions, which would have been the toughest in the U.S., would have scared business away from Colorado. Other states that ban gifts as small as pens or coffee cups have reported losing convention business, said Dr. Timothy Rodell, president of Globe Immune, a Louisville biotech company.

Companies conducting clinical trials also might fear having to disclose proprietary budgets and decide to conduct them in other states, said Tara Ryan, deputy vice president for the Pharmaceutical Research Manufacturers of America.

Carroll said threats that the bill would cost jobs were hollow, but members of the Senate Business, Labor and Technology Committee focused on the financial arguments.

They also complained that the bill tried to do too much.

“The basic idea that marketing and advertising and having a sales force is bad, I can’t buy that,” said Sen. Rollie Heath, D-Boulder. “What this bill basically does is condemn our way of doing business.”

Carroll tried to do a major overhaul of the bill, but Sen. Jennifer Veiga, D-Denver, committee chair, overruled any attempt at changes on the fly.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend