corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15114

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Jack A.
Novartis generics arm quits drugs trade body
The Financial Times.com 2009 Feb 16
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2ed7871a-fbc8-11dd-bcad-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1


Full text:

Novartis, the Swiss pharmaceutical group, has removed its generics arm from membership of the drug industry’s international trade body – a move rivals fear creates a two-tier system that could lower ethical standards.

At a closed meeting of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA) in Washington DC late last year, Novartis said it would hold membership via its patented drug subsidiary, Novartis Pharma AG, rather than its holding company.

The result – the first such instance – is to exclude Sandoz, its off-patent generic drugs arm, which is the world’s second largest, from IFPMA, including exemption from its revamped code of conduct.

The move comes as IFPMA concludes a probe triggered by criticism of Sandoz for allegedly breaching its ethical code concerning the labelling of its products.

It highlights growing tensions and potential conflicts when innovative pharmaceutical companies are diversifying into generics and other activities as they respond to pressures on sales.

Off-patent manufacturers are also clashing with drug developers over intellectual property, including over the extent to which generic versions of biological medicines are safe and how they should be regulated.

The decision by Novartis was taken in spite of the fact that Daniel Vasella, its chief executive, was the previous head of IFPMA who oversaw the adoption of a tougher new code of practice that could lead to stronger sanctions against its members for any breaches. There is no equivalent code of conduct for the international bodies operated by the generics sector.

Petra Laux, the head of global public affairs at Novartis, confirmed the change of membership status and said: “Sandoz is no longer a member of IFPMA and does not have to comply with its obligations.”

She stressed that Sandoz had its own internal code of conduct and values, The complaint triggering the investigation by IFPMA against Novartis’s generics arm had been judged “without merit”.

She added that Sandoz had never lobbied for its interests at IFPMA, including for the easier introduction of biological generics it was seeking, and it was logical for each subsidiary of Novartis to join the trade body aligned with its own interests, including one for generic companies and another for over-the-counter medicines, a third division of the Swiss group.

Since Novartis acquired Hexal of Germany to become the largest generics company after Teva of Israel, other pharmaceutical groups have expanded into the sector, including Sanofi-Aventis and GlaxoSmithKline. So far, neither has sought to tweak its IFPMA membership in the same way.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909