corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14997

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Call for Ethical Clinical Trials in Developing Countries
Amsterdam: WEMOS Foundation 2009 Feb
http://www.fairdrugs.org/uploads/files/Call_for_Ethical_Clinical_Trials_in_Developing_Countries.pdf


Abstract:

Before a new drug can be released onto the market, it has to be tested on human subjects in
order to assess its efficacy and safety. Increasingly, the pharmaceutical industry is carrying out
these trials in developing countries.

For pharmaceutical companies, lower costs are an important reason to undertake trials in developing
countries. Trials can also be carried out more quickly because regulatory constraints
are less stringent, while the low level of income in developing countries means that people are
often more willing to participate. However, there are good reasons to believe that trial subjects
in these countries are more vulnerable than those in wealthier nations…

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963