corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14744

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Jack A.
Goldman in talks over funding for pharma group
The Financial Times.com 2008 Dec 2
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto120220081651035711


Full text:

Goldman Sachs is in talks to provide hundreds of millions of dollars of funding to a large pharmaceutical company, in the first evidence of a new business model for the sector that will see financing shifted away from funding companies and towards targeted co-development of specific medicines.

Jon Symonds, managing director at the investment bank in London and former finance director of AstraZeneca, the Anglo-Swedish pharmaceutical group, said a first deal to create a new hybrid model of research and development should be finalised early next year.

Speaking at the FT Pharmaceuticals Conference, he said that the deal – which will be with a large, unidentified drug developer other than AstraZeneca – reflected the desire for even large companies with strong sales on existing drugs to seek funding for future development.
The move by Goldman reflects continuing and diversifying efforts to raise new funds despite the deteriorating market conditions in recent weeks.

It comes in response to the fast-rising costs and growing difficulties of bringing innovative new drugs through regulatory approval into healthcare systems, as existing medicines go off-patent and are subject to fresh generic legal challenges and pressure on pricing.

Mr Symonds said the large pharma companies were “trapped in their pipelines” by substantial commitments to costly late-stage clinical trials, with only limited funds for earlier stage medicines.

“There is a genuine shortage of capital,” he said.

However, their investors were reluctant to endorse new rounds of capitalraising, after disappointing returns from previous rounds of research onexperimental drugs that failed.

He said Goldman Sachs’ model therefore involved a different approach, creating a “research pool” into which pharma companies would place a range of experimental drugs in a single therapeutic area in early-stage phase 1 and 2 trials, where their specialists would work alongside external experts including scientists, chemists and clinical research organisations.

The action would help create more flexible, transparent and cheaper drug development, freed from large bureaucracies and heavy overheads. It would also share the high risks of new drug development with outside partners.

He said the model would potentially allow competing pharma companies working on similar drugs and duplicating research areas toall pool resources in this way.

“If we deliver one, there is huge appetite because capital is in pretty short supply,” Mr Symonds said.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909