corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14556

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Alkhateeb FM, Clauson KA, Khanfar NM, Latif DA.
Legal and regulatory risk associated with Web 2.0 adoption by pharmaceutical companies
Journal of Medical Marketing 2008 Sep 26; (8):311–318
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jmm/journal/v8/n4/abs/jmm200820a.html


Abstract:

Web 2.0 applications and tools include blogs, podcasts, wikis and social networking communities. These tools, especially blogs and wikis, have been rapidly adopted by internet-savvy patients as a source of information and discourse about medical conditions and treatment options. Information via these applications has had an impact on patients’ choices about their healthcare. In response, opportunities with Web 2.0 have been explored by pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions. These companies believe that Web 2.0 and Patient 2.0 tools offer an innovative way to connect with physicians and patients. Additionally, Web 2.0 can be a new method for marketing to consumers in an era where the return on investment is falling with more traditional channels. Neither the Food and Drug Administration nor Federal Trade Commission (FTC), however, has released firm guidance for Web 2.0 communications. Therefore, pharmaceutical companies are reticent regarding adoption of Web 2.0 for fear of a poor risk–benefit ratio and a lack of documented success with these tools. There are two primary concerns voiced when marketing via Web 2.0: off-label promotion and adverse event reporting. This paper provides an overview of Web 2.0, details associated regulatory risks and illustrates select strategies to help navigate these largely unexplored, but potentially powerful mechanisms to reach prescribers and patients.

Keywords:
blog, Patient 2.0, pharmaceutical e-marketing, social media, Web 2.0, wiki

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909