corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14504

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Goldstein J.
Senators Probe Cardiologists’ Ties to Stent Makers
The Wall Street Journal Blog 2008 Oct 16
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/10/16/senators-probe-cardiologists-ties-to-stent-makers/


Full text:

Sens. Chuck Grassley and Herb Kohl are making a habit of delving into financial ties between high-profile doctors and the drug and device industries.

The latest salvo came today, as the senators sent letters to Columbia University and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, asking about payments from stent makers to the institutions and affiliated doctors.

CRF’s founder, Martin Leon, as well as its current chairman, Gregg Stone, are both stent specialists affiliated with Columbia, and both are among the doctors listed by name in the letters. The foundation receives funding from device makers, among other sources, and conducts research.

The letters also ask for info about ties to a few companies in particular, including Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson – the four shops that sell stents in the U.S.

Kohl and Grassley have also been writing to drug and device makers directly lately, asking them about their payments to docs, and we wouldn’t be surprised if they’re doing a bit of triangulation here and seeking info from the companies as well.

Earlier this month, Grassley sent a letter to Emory that said a high-profile psychiatrist there had received more than $500,000 from GlaxoSmithKline over the course of a few years when he reported receiving payments of less than $10,000 per year from the company.

“CRF welcomes the inquiry from Senators Kohl and Grassley and intends to comply fully with their request for information,” the foundation, said in a statement emailed to the Health Blog. “CRF is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity in all of its research and educational activities and ensuring independence, objectivity and scientific rigor in all of its programs.” Columbia didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Grassley and Kohl back a bill that would require drug and device makers to report payments to doctors.

Update: In a statement, Columbia said it has received the letter and “look[s] forward to responding to its questions and requests for information. It is important to note that Columbia University and its Medical Center have conflict of interest policies and procedures in place and we expect that they are followed by all members of the faculty.”

Bonus Probe: This summer Kohl sent the American College of Cardiology a letter, asking the group about its partnership with the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, which receives funding from several device makers.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909