corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14498

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Patients want personal engagement – survey
PM Live 2008 Oct 16
http://www.pmlive.com/pharm_market/news.cfm?showArticle=1&ArticleID=7117


Full text:

The key findings to come out of a 5,000-patient, five-country study into the ways people engage with healthcare brands and companies reveals that no single channel, or group of channels, is dominant when providing health information.
While 96 per cent of people asked (in China, Germany, Russia, the UK and US) cite ‘my doctor or healthcare professional’ as the most credible information source, it was notable that health “influence happens across all channels”, according to results from the Edelman Health Engagement Barometer.

Even following consultation with a medic, around one-fifth of people – those informed patients who are actively engaged with health issues – seek validation of the information provided in nearly nine in 10 cases. This means, says Edelman, that for company or healthcare organisation “it is not a matter of whether or not it should be ‘in’ interactive channels, but a mandate to contribute to the conversation before it gets defined by others”.

The survey shows that people desire more active, trusted and personal health interaction with companies and brands. However, companies seeking to engage people on healthcare issues must, above all, address their specific, personal health concerns in order to nurture trust.

“Health engagement and trust fuel each other,” commented Nancy Turett, global president, health, at Edelman. “However, engagement is not fully reciprocal – the perceived balance of power is not equal – so companies seeking to engage effectively in health must foster trust.”

To do this, the findings suggest, firms should align their activities and priorities with patients motivation and desires – as these are the areas people are most involved and receptive. The top three were revealed as:

• Maintaining my health and wellbeing (74 per cent)
• Solving chronic health problems (66 per cent)
• Preventing disease (61 per cent).

Respondents (all of which were adults aged 18-75) made clear that they would engage more with healthcare companies which address their personal health concerns versus other issues, such as ‘innovation’ or ‘protecting privacy’.

The central message, overall, is: the higher someone’s personal stake in an issue, the higher their desire for engagement by healthcare companies.

More information is available at: www.engageinhealth.com

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909