corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14420

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Swiatek J.
Lily to pay $62M in 32-state Zyprexa settlement
The Indianapolis Star 2008 Oct 7
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081007/BUSINESS03/810070327/1278/BUSINESS03


Full text:

Eli Lilly and Co. will pay $62 million to 32 states to settle an investigation into improper marketing of top-selling drug Zyprexa.
The settlement, to be announced today, is the largest-ever multistate consumer protection action against a drug company, said Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter.

The money will be split among 32 states, with Indiana getting $1.6 million for consumer protection purposes and other activities in the attorney general’s office.
The states accused the Indianapolis drug maker of marketing the schizophrenia drug Zyprexa in violation of state consumer protection laws, starting in 2001.
The campaign promoted Zyprexa for non-federally approved uses, including use by children, at high dosage levels and in the elderly for dementia, the action by the attorneys general alleged. The settlement also calls for Lilly to abide by certain ethical marketing practices over the next six years, including putting its medical staff and not its marketing people in charge of writing medical letters to doctors.
“We’re glad the company resolved it and is moving toward greater transparency” in its marketing, Carter said. Lilly agreed to the settlement without an admission of fault, Carter said. A Lilly spokeswoman could not be reached for comment.
Zyprexa has been the source of several high-dollar settlements for Lilly, including the payout of more than $1 billion to resolve several thousand claims by patients who alleged the drug caused harmful and undivulged side effects, including weight gain and diabetes.
In July, a federal judge who oversaw the earlier settlement with U.S. patients, urged Lilly to enter into a similar settlement with worldwide patients who seek up to $7.7 billion.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909