corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14235

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Drug Ads: Big Waste Of Money?
The Washington Post 2008 Sep 2
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/29/AR2008082902646.html


Full text:

It’s big business, but it may not have the impact that drug companies hope and that medical ethicists have long worried about. Direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising has only a modest effect on the sale of drugs, according to research released online yesterday by BMJ, a British medical journal.

In 2006, U.S. pharmaceutical companies spent about $5 billion on consumer marketing campaigns — a practice that only two countries, the United States and New Zealand, permit.

DTC advertising has increased rapidly since 1997, when the Food and Drug Administration eased its regulations. At the same time, concerns have grown that consumers ask for drugs they see advertised in print and on TV and that, in response to that pressure, physicians prescribe them.

The new research suggests there may not be so much to worry about — and that drug companies may be wasting their advertising dollars. The five-year study was conducted in Canada, where DTC advertising is illegal but where English speakers hear and see U.S. ads. French-speaking Quebec acted as a control group. It focused on three drugs: Enbrel (for rheumatoid arthritis), Nasonex (for nasal allergies) and Zelnorm (for irritable bowel syndrome). Researchers looked at whether use of these drugs increased faster in the English-speaking regions following the launch of U.S. ad campaigns.

Prescription rates for Enbrel and Nasonex remained the same in both communities. Sales of Zelnorm initially spiked in English-speaking regions but after a few years resumed the same pattern as in French-speaking regions.

“Decisions to market directly to consumers [are] based on scant data,” says Stephen Soumerai, a professor at Harvard Medical School and principal investigator on the study, who emphasizes the complex chain from drugmaker to physician to consumer. Advertising prescription drugs is “not like popcorn, cereal and hair sprays,” he says.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909