corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14192

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Blum J.
Drugmakers Given Legal Shield By Rule, Lawyers Say
Bloomberg.com 2008 Aug 21
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aHcEVZn2wJhY


Full text:

U.S. regulators issued a rule that shields makers of drugs and medical devices from patients’ lawsuits by limiting changes companies can make to product warnings, according to lawyers who represent plaintiffs.

The rule (http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/FDA-2008-N-0032-nfr.pdf) posted today on the Food and Drug Administration’s Web site is likely to result in fewer company-initiated changes to package inserts and protect those selling products when they have ``knowledge of potentially hazardous side effects,’‘ said Gerie Voss, director of regulatory affairs for the American Association for Justice, a Washington-based group of trial lawyers.

Eight Democrats from the House and Senate objected in January after the FDA published a proposed version of the rule. The lawmakers said in a letter that the measure sets a higher standard for when companies can make changes to package inserts alerting consumers to new safety information without waiting for FDA approval. The effect would be to protect companies from being sued for failing to disclose risks, the lawmakers said.

``The final rule is going to give drug and device companies the ability to claim complete immunity for failing to warn about potentially hazardous side effects of prescription drugs and medical devices,’‘ Voss said today in a telephone interview.

Clarifies Policy

The rule clarifies an FDA policy that has long been in place, said Randall Lutter, the agency’s deputy commissioner for policy, in a telephone interview. It allows companies to add information to product labels before an FDA review is complete in certain circumstances, he said.

``This action should reduce confusion about what our policy is, clarify it and provide additional confidence to patients and doctors that information on medical product labels has a sensible scientific basis,’‘ Lutter said.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a Washington-based trade group, supports the FDA rule, said Ken Johnson, the association’s senior vice president, in a statement. Doctors and patients ``look to the FDA — widely considered the world’s gold standard — to provide them with balanced information,’‘ Johnson said.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909