Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14092

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

Publication type: Journal Article

Davis JM, Chen N, Glick ID.
Issues that may determine the outcome of antipsychotic trials: industry sponsorship and extrapyramidal side effect.
Nature 2008 Apr; 33:(5):971-5
http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/v33/n5/abs/1301493a.html;jsessionid=BE818FCB52D4772A6DFEF88D444AAB6F

Abstract:

This study presents a meta-analysis of the influence of several potentially biasing factors (eg industry support, extrapyramidal side effects) on efficacy of studies comparing second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) with first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) medications. We used the dataset from our previously published meta-analysis of 124 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGAs with FGAs, to evaluate whether certain possible biases could influence the actual outcome on the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scores. Industry sponsorship was determined by contact with authors or publication statement. We calculated whether (1) industry sponsorship, (2) study quality, (3) extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) properties, or (4) prophylactic antiparkinsonian medications influenced SGA vs FGA efficacy for each drug and averaged overall by two Hedges and Olkin-based meta-analyses. The analysis found that none of the factors was significantly associated with a particular outcome. While industry-sponsored articles may conclude their medication to be more favorable than that of a competitor in an RCT, we found that the observed efficacy was not influenced by sponsorship. Many attribute the finding that SGAs appears to be more efficacious than FGAs to be a result of EPS-decreasing efficacy (or its measurement). We were unable to confirm that the drug’s EPS properties or antiparkinsonian management altered actual efficacy.

Keywords:
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use* Basal Ganglia Diseases/chemically induced* Basal Ganglia Diseases/epidemiology Bias (Epidemiology) Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data Drug Industry/statistics & numerical data* Humans Mental Disorders/drug therapy* Mental Disorders/epidemiology Meta-Analysis as Topic Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/statistics & numerical data* Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Treatment Outcome