corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14060

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

US Senate slams orphan drug “price-gouging”
PharmaTimes 2008 Jul 26
http://www.pharmatimes.com/WorldNews/article.aspx?id=14005&src=EWorldNews


Full text:

US federal agencies have been asked to investigate “price-gouging” by pharmaceutical companies which have been increasing the prices of long-established drugs “to the very highest levels the market will bear,” Senators have claimed.

Such practices “look uncomfortably like an abuse of the pricing power we give to drug companies,” said Democratic Senator Charles Schumer, chairman of the Senate Joint Economic Committee, which held a hearing late last week to investigate the alleged practices.

Specifically, the hearing sought to examine the price increases which have been imposed on orphan drugs. Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar, who chaired the hearing, stated that “at least a handful of drug companies” have used the status assigned to these products by the 1983 Orphan Drug Act to keep on increasing their prices, at levels well beyond the costs of their research, development and manufacturing.

Because of limited market or other factors, these drugs’ prices are more likely to remain at these “astronomical” levels, she added. Moreover, not only do these “staggeringly high costs” threaten the stability of the families who rely on them, but also a “dramatic unforeseeable increase in price for one of these drugs has a significant impact on the federal government. If the wholesale cost of a drug goes up, Medicaid or Medicare has to pay for the increase,” said Sen Klobuchar, who added: “this seems like simple price-gouging to me.”

Madeline Carpinelli, research fellow with the PRIME Institute at the University of Minnesota, told the hearing that the Institute has found over one hundred cases since 2002 of the price of a single-source drug more than doubling due to a single price increase. About one in every twenty brand single-source drug products (5.3%) has had one or more price increases which are “extraordinary” – defined as changes of more than 100% at a single point in time – and with some increases of more than 10,000%, she said. “These enormous price increases certainly affect the individual patients who are using the medication and in aggregate these large price increases expand the ever-growing expenditures of private and public drug programmes,” she told the hearing.

Sen Schumer pointed out that the total number of American families touched by rare diseases is “quite high,” with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) estimating that 9%- 10% of the population, or nearly 30 million people, are affected. Approximately half of these people are children, and many of these rare diseases are present at birth, he added.

Senators Klobuchar and Schumer said they have asked the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and General Accountability Office (GAO) to look at the issues raised, and Sen Klobuchar added that the federal government ought to be able to track these pricing trends. “It’s disturbing that our providers, hospitals and patient are being blindsided by these exorbitant price increases,” she said. “If we start to monitor this data, there is more of a paper trail, giving use enhanced ability to do something about these companies’ practices. When provided with the right information on drug prices, especially in smaller markets, doctors can be alerted of big price increasing, potentially spurring generic alternatives to expensive drugs.”

Commenting on the hearing, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) said it recognised that “innovative medicines do no good if they sit on pharmacy shelves and out of reach of patients who need them the most.”

PhRMA chief executive Billy Tauzin also pointed out that fewer than 10 medicines had bee approved to treat rare diseases during the 1970s, but the passage in 1983 of the Orphan Drug Act has led to 325 orphan medicines being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat rare diseases. He added that more than 300 new orphan medicines are currently in the pipeline to treat diseases such as rare cancers, muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909