corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13844

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Johnson B.
Ala. attorney: 2 drug companies cheated Medicaid
Forbes.com 2008 Jun 17
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/06/17/ap5126334.html


Full text:

An attorney seeking as much as $400 million in damages from two large pharmaceutical companies told jurors Tuesday the firms defrauded Alabama’s Medicaid program with high prices for drugs for more than a decade.

Attorneys for Novartis Pharmaceuticals and SmithKline Beecham Corp. said the drugs were properly priced through a method understood by the state agency.

The trial, expected to last about two weeks, is the second to be held on more than 70 lawsuits filed by the state accusing pharmaceutical companies of overcharging Medicaid for prescription drugs. The first ended with a jury awarding the state $215 million against AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.

Similar lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies are pending in other states, including Mississippi, South Carolina, Utah, Hawaii and Alaska.

Jere Beasley, a Montgomery lawyer represening the state, told jurors Tuesday that Novartis and SmithKline Beecham committed fraud by causing the Medicaid program to pay too much for prescription drugs from 1991 to 2005.

“These two companies each cheated the state over and over and over again,” Beasley told jurors.

He noted the financail crunch Alabama’s Medicaid agency has faced in recent years.

“You’re going to have the opportunity to bring about change and hopefully you can stop this sort of thing,” Beasley said.

He indicated to jurors Monday he would seek a judgment of some $200 million against each of the two companies.

Attorneys for the two firms said Tuesday they reported fair, correct prices to Medicaid and did not commit fraud.

“These lawyers would have you believe Novartis has been intentionally reporting prices that we knew were false,” said Novartis attorney Harlan Prater. He said Novartis used a common system used for decades to determine prices and that the state understood the system.

An attorney for SmithKline Beecham, Chilton Varner, told jurors the company never overcharged the state Medicaid program. She said the state Medicaid system has not changed the way it pays for drugs, despite the charges made in the lawsuits.

“The reason is there is no fraud here. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” said Varner.

Beasley said one way the companies cheated the state was by not including discounts in the price of drugs it was reporting to pharmacists. But Varner and Prater said discounts normally are not included in the list price and are usually negotiated later.

Novartis produces a number of drugs, including the high blood pressure medications Diovan and Tekturna. SmithKline makes the asthma medication Advair and other prescription drugs.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909