corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13823

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Silverman E.
Consumers Want Gifts To Docs Disclosed: Survey
Pharmalot 2008 Jun
http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/06/consumers-want-gifts-to-docs-disclosed-survey


Notes:

http://www.prescriptionproject.org/assets/pdfs/Prescripton%20Project%20Survey_0618.pdf


Full text:

A majority of Americans – 68 percent – support legislation to require drugmakers to disclose gifts and payments to docs, according to a new survey by the Prescription Project. Americans also disapprove of many types of gifts and payments to docs, support legislation that would allow clinical experts to provide unbiased drug info to doc in the form of academic detailing, and think pharma has a moderate to extremely large influence on prescribing patterns by docs.
Other findings: 52 percent say accepting gifts from pharma influences how docs make prescribing decisions and another 26 percent believe gifts have a moderate influence. 86 percent believe free dinners should not be allowed; 80 percent believe speaking fees shouldn’t allowed; 78 percent believe free lunches at the office shouldn’t be allowed; 70 percent believe free note pads and pens shouldn’t be allowed, and 62 percent believe free attendance at mandatory CME shouldn’t be allowed.
What else? 64 percent believe it’s important to know a doc’s financial ties to drugmakers; 68 percent would support legislation requiring drugmakers to publicly disclose any gifts or payments given to docs; 62 percent support legislation that makes it easier to tell how much money and gifts a doctor receives from drugmakers; 71 percent would support legislation that promotes academic detailing; 55 percent say they would be unlikely to directly ask their docs if he or she has accepted gifts, speaking fees or other financial support from a drugmaker.
Here are the complete results. The survey was conducted between June 4 and June 8, queried 1009 adults across the US.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909