corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13812

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Doctors rate Novartis sales reps as the best, says survey
PharmaTimes 2008 Jun 19
http://www.pharmatimes.com/WorldNews/article.aspx?id=13737&src=EWorldNews


Full text:

New research has just been published which reveals that among US primary care physicians, Novartis earns the highest sales rep relationship scores, followed by Pfizer, Merck & Co, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Aventis.

The study, carried out by market research firm TNS Healthcare and based on the responses of 1,500 primary care physicians, notes that Novartis also takes the top spot in Europe, “demonstrating a consistent ability to build strong physician relationships”. Pfizer also shows pretty good overall rep relationship scores, but it has greater variability in Europe, while Merck’s European performance lags behind its US results.

All 15 companies evaluated in the TNS survey score relatively highly on rep-related attributes, including personal and professional conduct, knowledge and expertise and sales visit quality and value. However the study claims that it is their performance “across the full range of other service experiences that set the winners apart”.

For example, Novartis earns the highest marks from doctors on virtually every sales and service activity, including patient and physician education, practice and staff support, brand experience and corporate reputation. However for both Novartis and Pfizer, internet services are relative “weak spots” but a strong area for Merck.

Andrew Brana, TNS global consultant for sales force optimisation, said that a “key takeaway for pharmaceutical companies is that, to build the strongest physician relationships, they must be able to connect with doctors through a host of activities beyond just traditional message delivery”. To stand out from competitors, “they must bring a range of value-add brand services into the detail,” he added.

However Mr Brana also noted that in all the countries surveyed, including the USA and the five major European markets, “physician education is very highly valued” but “no company is doing particularly well in this area”. As a result, education “represents a powerful chance for companies to differentiate themselves and strengthen their physician relationships”, he concluded.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963