corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13730

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Puliyel JM, Shrivastava A.
Global access to vaccines: Poor nations are being lured into a debt trap
BMJ 2008 May 3; 336:(7651):974
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/336/7651/974-c?etoc


Abstract:

With regard to access to papillomavirus vaccine (Gardasil),1 let us assume that the vaccine covers all strains causing cervical cancer. In India 21m girls would have to be vaccinated each year to avoid 260 000 deaths at a cost for the vaccine alone of $8400m. The programme would have to be sustained for over 20 years. Even if it prevented all cervical cancers, it would reduce by only 2% the 10.9m deaths caused by infectious diseases.2 If the cost of the vaccine fell to $1 per dose, it would still cost $63m for the vaccine alone.

So rotavirus causes 440 000 deaths each year.1 If we have a vaccine that covers all the human strains (an overgenerous assumption for India3), 126m children around 2 months of age will need to be vaccinated three times (378m doses).2 At the present public sector cost of $7/dose4 the cost of the vaccine . . . [Full text of this article]

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963