corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13617

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Drug ads scrutinized by Congress
United Press International 2008 May 8
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Business/2008/05/08/drug_ads_scrutinized_by_congress/7726/


Full text:

WASHINGTON, May 8 (UPI) — Drug company television ads have crossed ethical boundaries due to political appointments at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, a congressman said.

U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said appointed attorneys allowed Johnson & Johnson to promote the drug Procrit for fighting fatigue, although it isn’t one of drug’s approved uses, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

Stupak heads the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, which plans to review direct-to-consumer drug ads.

A controversy over a Pfizer Inc. advertisement for the blockbuster drug Lipitor, featuring Robert Jarvik, who contributed to the invention of the artificial heart, have also given Democrats ammunition for cracking down on drug ads, the Journal reported.

Critics say Jarvik, who isn’t a medical doctor, appears in the ad giving medical advise.

Ken Johnson, vice president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America said the ads prompt consumers to visit their doctors.

Television companies are also positioned to defend the ad campaigns.

Pharmaceutical companies spent roughly $2.5 billion on television ads in 2007, the report said.

“The drug and TV and cable industries have formed a cabal here to protect their revenues,” Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union told the Journal.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.