corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13616

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Perrone M.
Drug companies defend TV advertisements before Congress
Associated Press 2008 May 8
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/08/ap4986278.html?partner=alerts


Full text:

WASHINGTON – Some of the nation’s largest pharmaceutical companies defended their TV advertisements Thursday from Democrats calling for tougher restrictions on what they call misleading marketing.

Executives from Pfizer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and a joint venture between Merck and Schering Plough will testify before House lawmakers on three discontinued advertisements. All three promotions were criticized by Democrats on a House committee as potentially misleading consumers.

A senior vice president for Merck and Schering’s joint venture stated in prepared testimony that advertisements for the cholesterol pill Vytorin “only made claims that are supported by research.” Senior Vice President Deepak Khanna’s testimony also stated that the Food and Drug Administration cleared all the claims made in the promotions.

The colorful advertisements, dubbed the “food and family” campaign, told viewers bad cholesterol can be caused by diet as well as family history. The promotions ran in heavy rotation beginning in 2004 and helped push Vytorin sales to more than $5.1 billion last year.

Democrats have stepped up their scrutiny of prescription drug companies in recent months after revelations that Merck and Schering Plough’s Vytorin is no better at stopping deadly plaque build-up than a low-cost generic.

The study was completed in 2006 but the companies didn’t release the information until January, after Congress began investigating the delayed trial.

Merck and Schering pulled the spots after releasing the disappointing study results.

The Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s subcommittee for oversight said new restrictions may be needed to “protect American consumers from manipulative commercials.”

Last year Democrats tried unsuccessfully to pass a law that would ban consumer-directed advertisements during the first three years after a drug’s approval. They are expected to make a similar push later this year.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963