corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13600

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Psaty BM, Ray W.
FDA guidance on off-label promotion and the state of the literature from sponsors.
JAMA 2008 Apr 23; 299:(16):1949-51
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/299/16/1949


Abstract:

Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews and approves drugs for specific indications, the approval does not usually limit the use of those drugs in clinical practice. Indeed, prescribing for indications not reviewed by the FDA (“off-label”) is common. In a recent study of 160 frequently prescribed drugs,1 off-label use represented 21% of drug mentions, and 73% of these off-label uses had little or no scientific support. Off-label use has long been controversial because large numbers of patients may receive drugs that have had only limited testing for efficacy and safety, and some off-label uses may eventually be shown to have an unfavorable risk-benefit profile. High-profile examples include the use of the combination of fenfluramine and phentermine by millions of persons for weight loss and the widespread use of hormone therapy by postmenopausal women to prevent coronary artery disease.

Although the FDA does not restrict physician prescribing for off-label indications, it does regulate the manufacturer’s promotion for such use…

Recently, the FDA proposed new guidelines that enable sponsors to distribute publications about unapproved uses of approved drugs and devices…

Selective Publication of Studies

Manipulation of the Literature

Absence of Critical Information

Potential for Undermining the NDA Review Process

Conclusions

Keywords:
Publication Types: Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH Terms: Drug Approval* Drug Industry* Drug Labeling Guidelines as Topic Legislation, Drug* Publishing* United States United States Food and Drug Administration* Grant Support: HL080295/HL/United States NHLBI HL085251/HL/United States NHLBI HL087652/HL/United States NHLBI HL74745/HL/United States NHLBI

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909