corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13588

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Silverman E.
New Jersey’s Attorney General And Antipsychotics
Pharmalot 2008 Apr 23
http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/04/new-jerseys-attorney-general-and-antipsychotics/


Full text:

Earlier this year, we noted that New Jersey’s Medicaid program spent more than $73 million on several antipsychotic meds for children less than 18 years old between 2000 and 2007, according to state records, even though the drugs weren’t approved by the FDA for treating kids. And a state official acknowledges the drugs may have been prescribed for conditions other than schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the approved uses.

And so a state legislator wrote New Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram calling for an investigation. In his letter, Pat Diegnan, an assemblyman who has previously been outspoken about the use of these meds, asked Milgram to pursue an investigation of the “alleged misrepresentations concerning the safety and effectiveness of antipscychotic drugs,” which he first requested more than a year ago of her predecessor.

In an April 1 reply, Milgram writes back that New Jersey is part of a multi-state working group investigating the marketing of Lilly’s Zyprexa. To be specific, about 30 states are looking into the controversy over off-label promotion and the extent to which side effects, such as diabetes and weight gain, were hidden. But Milgram doesn’t mention any other drugmaker or their antipsychotics in her response. Does this mean the AG isn’t looking at the issue? Or simply doesn’t want to tip her hand? A spokesman declined to comment.

“Please be assured that this office remains committed to taking action appropriate when we learn of allegations of misrepresentations related to the safety and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals,” Milgram wrote. To date, Milgram has created a task force to examine the interplay between drugmakers and docs, and has subpoeaned Merck, Schering-Plough and Amgen over marketing various meds.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963