corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13576

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Taylor L.
Pharma 'must take more responsibility for quality'; FDA
Pharma Times 2008 Apr 27
http://www.pharmatimes.com/WorldNews/article.aspx?id=13359&src=EWorldNews


Full text:

The US Food and Drug Administration will never have sufficient resources to be “the quality-control unit of the world,” and drugmakers will have to assume more responsibility for the quality of their products, a senior agency official has told US legislators.

The FDA is not the industry’s quality system, and the agency is holding companies accountable, Janet Woodcock, director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, warned after addressing a hearing convened on April 24 by Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy, chairman of the Senate Education, Labor, Health and Pensions (HELP) Committee to discuss the contaminated heparin supply. “Any legislative fixes that do not address quality by design will fail,” she added.

Dr Woodcock told the panel that much of the USA’s pharmaceutical process has moved overseas in the last 15 years, with finished medicines then being imported back into the country, and that elements of generic drugs can be produced in as many as 15 different facilities. The FDA of “the last century” is not constructed to regulate the volume of medicines and foods which are now produced abroad, she said, adding that while the agency’s responsibilities have soared, inspection resources have dropped.

Sen Kennedy agreed with Dr Woodcock that the agency needs increased funding for inspections and also called on drugmakers to improve their testing for contamination and impurities. “Even the most up-to-date manufacturing processes won’t ensure safety if manufacturers can’t guarantee the ingredients aren’t contaminated,” he said.

However, Senator Mike Enzi, the Ranking (Republican) Committee member, pointed out that more inspections by FDA officials would not have discovered the contaminated heparin and that increased funding would not guarantee the safety of imports. The reality of the global economy is that testing every food and drug product from outside the USA is not currently possible, “nor will it ever be,” he said.

- On April 21, the FDA reported that 11 countries – Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, New Zealand and the USA – have found contaminated heparin within their boundaries. Sen Kennedy responded that there is now “no excuse for delay. Congress and the Administration must work with the FDA to keep Americans safe from these tainted drugs. At a time when the American people are being asked to provide yet more billions for Iraq, we must make certain that the resources are found to address challenges at home,” he said.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909