corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1347

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Loyd L.
Makers of a Viagra rival have deal with NFL: Parody
Philadelphia Inquirer 2003 Jul 17


Full text:

Makers of a Viagra rival have deal with NFL The three-year sponsorship pact – the league’s first with a drugmaker – gives marketing rights to the makers of Levitra.

GlaxoSmithKline P.L.C. and Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., which have a rival drug to challenge Viagra, announced a three-year sponsorship agreement yesterday with the National Football League.

The deal, which gives Glaxo and Bayer exclusive marketing rights in the men’s health category, is the league’s first sponsorship with pharmaceutical companies, the NFL said.

The league reversed its longstanding policy this year of banning advertising and corporate sponsorships by drug companies.

Glaxo, which has a U.S. headquarters in Philadelphia, and Bayer are co-marketing Levitra, a round orange pill to treat erectile dysfunction that aims to topple Viagra, the famous blue pill from Pfizer Inc. that transformed the treatment of male impotence five years ago.

The NFL and the companies declined to comment on the details, because Levitra, also known by the chemical name vardenafil, is awaiting U.S. regulatory approval, which could come as early as next month.

“The NFL is the most admired sports league in the U.S., and Bayer and GSK are delighted and proud to be joining them on this groundbreaking, innovative initiative,” said David Pernock, Glaxo’s senior vice president of pharmaceutical sales and marketing.

As a corporate sponsor, “it will give us access to the NFL’s loyal, enthusiastic fan base and an opportunity to reach over 120 million football fans a week who watch the games,” said Glaxo spokesman Michael Fleming. He said the drugmakers planned to reach fans with messages about men’s health issues.

Advertising Age, a trade publication, reported that Glaxo and Bayer would pay the NFL $6 million a year for three years and would spend an additional $10 million to $15 million in media advertising. The companies have reportedly signed a deal with former Chicago Bears head coach Mike Ditka to endorse Levitra in a series of ads.

The deal allows the companies to use the NFL logo in their marketing and to identify themselves as NFL sponsors. They still must purchase time or space from the networks or print publications.

NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said the league lifted its ban on pharmaceutical advertising in January after the Super Bowl. “We felt more comfortable, knowing that prescription drugs are heavily regulated. The NFL modified its policy.”

The league will accept sponsorships as well as product advertising in eight categories of medicines: allergy, cholesterol reducing, dermatology, diabetes, gastrointestinal, hair renewal and growth, prostate, and erectile dysfunction, McCarthy said.

The marketing battle to unseat Viagra will be fierce. More than 30 million U.S men have impotence problems, and despite Viagra’s success, only about 15 percent to 20 percent of them are being treated, urologists say.

Industry analysts expect Levitra (pronounced luh-VEE-tra) to be the first drug approved in the United States to take on Viagra, which last year had $1.7 billion in global sales. A third rival, Cialis (pronounced see-ALL-iss), from Eli Lilly & Co. and Icos Corp., is expected to receive marketing approval by the end of the year.

Since lifting the marketing ban, the NFL has been contacted by numerous pharmaceutical companies, McCarthy said. The league has established stringent guidelines, including one that bars endorsement by current owners, players and coaches if they are in uniform or identified with their clubs.

McCarthy said the league would review all advertising proposals to ensure “full compliance” with state and federal laws and FDA regulations.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909