corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13371

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Eliasson M, Bergqvist D.
[Research results should be freely accessible!-- Case reports demonstrate obstacles to contact with drug industry].
Lakartidningen 2001 Sep 12; 98:(37):3913-6
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11586830


Abstract:

Recommendations on the use of medical technologies should be based on best available evidence. Publication bias due to delayed publication or non-publication of negative studies leads to inflated effect sizes in systematic reviews. We carried out a health technology assessment on prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and in order to minimize publication bias asked the six pharmaceutical companies with antithrombotic drugs registered in Sweden to supply us with results from unpublished clinical trials. The answers were returned after 4 to 60 weeks, and with only one exception, after multiple reminders by telephone, fax and e-mail. No relevant unpublished studies were reported to us although we were made aware of two published studies that our literature search had not identified. One company did not mention a large negative unpublished clinical trial with their drug which has remained unpublished due to conflict between the company and the steering committee. We conclude that the companies did not contribute much and that the process was very time consuming with little result. As non-publication of trial results is unethical, we propose agreements between industry and researchers that all studies be prospectively registered and made publicly available.

mats.eliasson@nll.se

Keywords:
Publication Types: English Abstract MeSH Terms: Clinical Trials as Topic/standards Conflict of Interest Drug Industry* Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects Humans Peer Review, Research/standards Practice Guidelines as Topic* Publishing/standards Research/standards* Substances: Fibrinolytic Agents


Notes:

[Article in Swedish]

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend