corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13272

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Poor Markets, Rich Rewards: Pharmaceuticals and poor countries
The Economist 2004 Sep 3056
http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_PNVPDDQ


Abstract:

PUTTING profits before patients is not what many pharmaceutical companies would like to be known for. But that is exactly the reputation many of them earned in 2001, when 39 firms sued the South African government over changes to its patent laws to ease the supply of affordable anti-HIV medicines.

Since then, the industry has been scrambling to redeem its tarnished reputation. Many firms have agreed to make some existing drugs more accessible to developing countries; a few, such as GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, are trying to develop new drugs for diseases which mainly afflict poor countries. …

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.