corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13253

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Stanton R.
Drug company payments: Put declaration in abstracts.
BMJ 2008 Feb 16; 336:(7640):345
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/336/7640/345-d


Abstract:

Taylor argues that speakers should declare funding.1 Most journals now demand competing interest to be declared in a full article, but when the abstract of the paper is published on Medline or elsewhere the declaration disappears. We all know that students, journalists, or others should read the full article, but the fact is that many people only read the abstract of many papers. Conflict of interest should always be included-including in an abstract.

rstanton@snoopashoal.com

Taylor MS. Speakers should declare funding. BMJ 2008;336:234. (2 February.) doi:10.1136/bmj.39465.455995.3A[Free Full Text]

Keywords:
Publication Types: Comment Letter MeSH Terms: Disclosure* Drug Industry/economics* Interprofessional Relations/ethics* Research Support as Topic/economics*


Notes:

Comment on:
BMJ. 2008 Feb 2;336(7638):234.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.