corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1325

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Pugh T.
Medical TV channel challenged over ethics: The Patient Channel blurs the line between advertising and patient education, critics say.
The Philadelphia Inquirer 2003 Jun 30


Full text:

WASHINGTON – Many health-care experts and consumer advocates want hospitals to pull the plug on a 24-hour television channel that broadcasts health-care programs – and prescription drug ads – in more than 600 hospitals nationwide.

The Patient Channel delivers half-hour and hour-long programs to patients’ rooms and waiting rooms that tell viewers how to recognize, treat and live with ailments such as diabetes, high blood pressure and stroke. Other offerings tell how to take medicines properly and tout the value of exercise and good nutrition.

Teresa DeVore, a patient at Wheeling Hospital in Wheeling, W. Va., heartily endorsed the Patient Channel, produced by General Electric Medical Systems of Waukesha, Wis.

“I enjoy it,” said DeVore, 44, a licensed practical nurse. “They give you a lot of information in a little bit of time, and it’s information a lot of people don’t know.” She said she’d watch the Patient Channel at home if it were available.

For now, the commercials are easy to miss. They account for only 18 minutes of the fledgling channel’s daily airtime, though that will change as soon as marketers can sell more.

Bruce Dan, a physician who is the channel’s managing editor and a frequent on-air personality, envisions a program about depression, for example, that would lead naturally into commercials for antidepressants such as Prozac, Zoloft and Paxil.

Drug companies “want to get their message out to their potential audience just like any purveyor of a product,” Dan said. “Direct-to-consumer advertising is part of the fabric of consumer advertising in this country.”

That prospect outrages some, however, who say the channel’s prescription drug ads try to influence patients at a vulnerable time. Some doctors worry that the ads could undermine their independence as prescription-writers. Medical ethics experts fear patients will assume that hospitals that offer the Patient Channel endorse the products advertised.

Those concerns have prompted at least one large hospital chain, San Francisco-based Catholic Healthcare West, to ban the channel from its facilities. A hospital accrediting group has chastised the Patient Channel for an allegedly deceptive claim and for what it calls blurring the line between programming and advertising. And Commercial Alert, a Portland, Ore., consumer watchdog group, has drafted a petition with the signatures of 37 physicians who oppose the station on ethical grounds.

The controversies come as GE seeks to expand its viewership to more than 1,000 hospitals by year’s end.

In Dan’s view, the critics are overreacting.

The station is one of many available to patients, he argued. “If they don’t like it, they can change the channel or turn it off,” he said. He added that drug ads aren’t the only commercials the channel airs.

Dan said the channel should be praised – instead of scorned – for helping to educate patients when doctors and nurses are often too busy.

Marcia Angell, a senior lecturer on social medicine at Harvard Medical School, vehemently disagreed on the issue of education.

“This is not patient education. And it’s phony baloney to pretend that it is. This is advertising,” she said. “It’s designed to get that patient right at that moment to ask their doctor, ‘Do I need these drugs?’ “

Dan wondered what was wrong with that. “If that conversation takes place between a doctor and a patient after having watched the channel, isn’t that great to finally have the doctors and patients talking to each other?”

George Reisz, the chairman of the Department of Medicine at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, sided with Angell.

“The fact that it’s in my waiting room implies to the patient that it has my approval, and that may or may not be the case. It compromises the ethics of the situation,” Reisz said.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, which sets health quality standards for hospitals, recently rebuffed the Patient Channel. At issue was a claim in the channel’s marketing materials that said the programming supports hospital staffs’ efforts to meet the commission’s requirements for patient education.

Dan responded: “If that bothers them, we’ll take it out.”

Commission president Dennis S. O’Leary also noted that patients might confuse the channel’s educational content with commercials because there’s no clear buffer between ads and programming.

“We think it’s clear,” Dan said, “but if they think it needs a little more demarcation, we’d be happy to do it.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend