corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13223

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Christie T.
Reformers resist aggressive drug marketing tactics
The Register-Guard 2008 Mar 2
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/dt.cms.support.viewStory.cls?cid=


Full text:

Dr. Gail Hacker still remembers the pitch she got from a pharmaceutical
sales representative early in her medical career.

“If I put my next five hypertensive patients on his drug, he would send me
and my husband out to a nice dinner,” she said.

Hacker, a family physician who now works at Lane Community College’s health
clinic, says she declined the offer. But she says it opened her eyes to the
lengths to which the pharmaceutical industry would go to promote its
products. And it led her to swear off all the freebies that the industry
routinely bestows on doctors and their staffs, from pens and clipboards
inscribed with drug names, to free lunches and drug samples.

“I can afford my own pen,” she said.

Hacker is among a growing number of doctors, lawmakers and public interest
groups who are fighting back against the pharmaceutical industry’s
aggressive marketing.

Groups such as Nofreelunch.org and the Prescription Project are working to
curb the influence of the pharmaceutical industry, which spent nearly $30
billion marketing its wares to consumers and doctors in 2005, including
$18.4 billion for drug samples, according to a 2007 study in the New
England Journal of Medicine. About $6.7 billion was spent on direct
marketing to doctors.

A study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine found
that 94 percent of doctors have some type of relationship with the
pharmaceutical industry, 83 percent received food in the workplace, and 78
percent got free drug samples. More than one-quarter were paid for
consulting, giving lectures or signing up patients for drug trials.

The Oregon Academy of Family Physicians, representing 1,300 doctors around
the state, announced last week that it would no longer accept financial
support from the pharmaceutical industry, swearing off unrestricted grants
for continuing education seminars, sponsorship of events or advertisements
in its publications. But individual members can still see pharmaceutical
reps at their discretion.

“This is about taking the institutional view that as a professional medical
society, we are committed to decision-making that is based on scientific
evidence,” said Kerry Gonzales, the group’s executive director. “We want to
avoid even the perception of influence or impropriety.”

The Eugene-Springfield area’s two largest medical practices, PeaceHealth
Medical Group and Oregon Medical Group, both have policies intended to curb
the influence of pharmaceutical representatives, but neither has outright
bans on gifts or drug samples.

“We don’t encourage any kinds of gifts,” said Michelle Anderson, OMG’s
director of patient and clinical support. “We encourage staff not to accept
them.”

OMG requires pharmaceutical reps to wear a name badge while in clinics, and
it doesn’t allow them to bring lunches, although they can bring snacks if
they’re hosting a talk on a particular medication.

“The providers like to get the information about what’s out there,” she
said. “But they are going to prescribe” a particular drug “because it’s the
best thing for the patient, not because of any incentive program.”

At PeaceHealth Medical Group, gifts such as pens, pads and coffee mugs are
discouraged, but not banned, said Bobbe Picolet, manager of clinic
operations for the group’s family medicine program. Reps are barred from
clinic hallways, waiting rooms and drug cabinets.

“They’re not happy about it, but they’re complying,” she said. “They know
things are coming down. They’re trying to be as nice as they can.”

Doctors finally just grew weary of the aggressive marketing, she said.

“Integrity-wise, it’s not the right thing to do,” she said.

When it comes to drug samples, PeaceHealth Medical Group will accept only
those drugs that are in its formulary – certain classes of medicines that
are proven effective and affordable, “We don’t accept the newest” drugs,
she said. “A patient gets on a high-powered (new) drug and they can’t
afford it” when the samples run out.

Picolet said meals are prohibited unless accompanied by a pre-approved
continuing education program. Reps are not allowed to bring in lunch for
the clinic staff to pitch a new drug, she said.

“It can’t just be a pharmaceutical sales rep making a sales call,” she said.

Gifts such as pens, pads and coffee mugs are discouraged as well, she said.

At McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center in Springfield, pharmaceutical
representatives can be seen only by appointment, and only to present
information on drugs already in the hospital’s formulary, spokeswoman Debi
Farr said. The hospital doesn’t take any drug samples. Reps can bring meals
for staff if they’re connected to an education event, which occur once or
twice a month, she said. The hospital has no policy barring gifts such as
pens and mugs, she said.

River Road Medical Group, with four doctors and three physician assistants,
is too small to have a policy on dealing with drug reps, said one of its
doctors, Lorne Bigley, but he has his own rules.

Bigley said he doesn’t talk to pharmaceutical representatives unless
they’ve got a brandnew drug in a brandnew class. He doesn’t accept pens,
mugs or other gifts. He doesn’t accept drug samples unless it’s a
medication that he already prescribes.

Rather than be swayed by sales pitches, Bigley said he would rather
prescribe medicines that are proven to work and to be cost effective.

And he packs his own lunch. When drug reps bring lunch for the office, he
won’t eat it.

“If I eat it I feel obligated to listen to them,” he said.

Ken Johnson, senior vice president of the Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America, defended industry gifts to doctors, saying it was
“insulting to suggest that doctors would prescribe medications based on who
gave them a slice of pizza, a pen or a medical dictionary.”

And in fact, many of the gifts the industry confers on doctors might be
considered token: a pen or pad of sticky notes, a coffee mug or a deli
sandwich. But studies show that even small gifts can influence doctors’
prescribing practice.

“Even those little gifts create a sense of obligation,” said Dr. Gary
Chiodo, chief integrity officer at Oregon Health & Science University in
Portland. The industry “wouldn’t be doing those things ifthey didn’t work.”

Social science research has shown that the impulse to reciprocate for even
small gifts is a powerful influence on people’s behavior, wrote the authors
of a January 2006 article in the Journal of the American Medical
Association that called on doctors and academic medical centers to change
their ways.

“Individuals receiving gifts are often unable to remain objective; they
reweigh information and choices in light of the gift,” wrote the authors,
who included leaders of Harvard, Columbia, Tufts, University of Washington
and University of California medical schools.

Researchers who looked specifically at the relationship between doctors and
the pharmaceutical industry found that receiving gifts is associated with
positive physician attitudes toward drug company representatives, the
researchers said. The rate of drug prescriptions by physicians increases
substantially after they see sales reps, attend company-supported education
meetings, or accept samples.

The authors called for a ban on all gifts, meals, payment for travel to or
time at meetings, and payment for participating in education meetings.

“The standing of the (medical) profession, as much as the integrity of the
pharmaceutical and medical device industries, is jeopardized by allowing
obvious conflicts to continue,” wrote the authors.

OHSU is among the institutions that took notice. The state’s only medical
school is close to adopting a revised policy toward freebies, following the
lead of institutions such as Harvard, Yale and Vanderbilt, which have
adopted “zero-tolerance” policies on industry gifts, said Chiodo, the
integrity officer.

The revised policy will allow doctors and medical students to accept “not
so much as an ink pen,” he said.

“I think we’re now in a situation where the health care profession needs to
eliminate even the appearance of a conflict” of interest, he said.

OHSU’s medical students in particular feel strongly about rejecting the
marketing freebies, he said. “They clearly had a much stronger feeling that
it should be zero tolerance,” he said. “They can see how even small things
might either influence or create the appearance of influence.”

Johnson, the industry spokesman, said the PhRMA ethics code bars its
representatives from providing any form of entertainment to doctors, and
that only modest meals should be provided when the reps meet with doctors.
The code also states that gifts must not exceed $100 in value and should
benefit patients or support a medical practice, he said.

Physicians who meet with drug company representatives learn about drug side
effects and how to use medicines, Johnson said. Dispensing free samples
helps doctors figure out which medications to prescribe.

“The simple fact is company representatives help physicians provide
effective patient care,” he said.

Critics say that, on the contrary, aggressive marketing by pharmaceutical
representatives can undermine the quality of care doctors provide to
patients.

Case in point: Vioxx.

After the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug was approved for treatment of
arthritis and other chronic pain conditions in 1999, Merck engaged in a
costly marketing war that pitted Vioxx against rival drug Celebrex.

Five years later, Merck pulled Vioxx off the market after it was linked to
a higher risk of heart attacks and stroke. More than 2 million Americans
were taking Vioxx when Merck pulled the plug.

“Anyone who took Vioxx and had a heart attack could lay some claim to the
fact that this was related to the marketing of the drug, not only to
consumers but to physicians,” said Rob Restuccia, executive director of the
Prescription Project, a Boston-based nonprofit organization working to curb
the influence of pharmaceutical marketers.

Patient care suffers when doctors prescribe new, heavily promoted yet
unproven drugs, overlooking cheaper, established drugs that often are
equally effective, Restuccia said.

Many doctors are reluctant to stop accepting them, because they can provide
poor patients with drugs they might not otherwise afford.

But the patients most likely to benefit from free drug samples are not the
poor but rather the insured and the well-off, according to a study
published last month in the American Journal of Public Health.

Among all persons who received drug samples in 2003, 82 percent had health
insurance all year, while 18 percent were uninsured for all or part of the
year. And 72 percent of sample recipients had income of 200 percent or more
of the federal poverty line, while 28 percent had income less than 200
percent of the poverty line.

That study prompted the Prescription Project to call on physician groups
and academic medical centers to stop accepting drug samples or strictly
regulate and limit their use.

The goal of samples is not to provide free medicine but to initiate product
use, Restuccia said. Rarely does a patient receive all the samples they
need, particularly for a chronic condition, he said.

“We know that by getting the samples, doctors feel compelled, feel
obligated to prescribe the drugs,” Restuccia said.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend