corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13212

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Goldstein J.
Feds Mull Funding Drug Pitches to Counter Big Pharma
The Wall Street Journal 2008 Mar 12
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/03/12/feds-mull-funding-drug-pitches-to-counter-big-pharma/?mod=googlenews_wsj


Full text:

A strategy used here and there to counter marketing by drug-industry sales reps could go big time if some federal lawmakers have their way. A influential senator wants to fund a nationwide launch of the strategy, which gives docs sales-rep-style presentations in their offices to present a balanced view of the risks and benefits of both new, expensive drugs and old, cheap ones.

Senator Herb Kohl, a Wisconsin Democrat, argues that the strategy, known as “counter detailing” or “academic detailing,” would ultimately save money by persuading doctors to prescribe more of the cheap drugs and fewer of the expensive ones. “As the single largest purchaser of prescription drugs in the country, the federal government can’t afford to pass up the opportunity to expand academic detailing nationwide,” Kohl told the Associated Press.

A drug industry group told the AP it doesn’t oppose the measure, but questioned whether the government ought to get involved. “The First Amendment provides everyone with a right to speak, including Uncle Sam,” said John Kamp, director of the Coalition for Healthcare Communication. “But I question whether the federal government needs to be in the business of countering pharmaceutical sales.”

To bolster his case, Kohl’s hosting a hearing in Washington today with some of the folks who’ve been counter-detailing for a while. A Kaiser Permanente official will describe how the health system’s internal education program led Kaiser docs a few years back to prescribe Cox-2 inhibitors such as Merck’s Vioxx at a far lower level than docs nationwide – a trend that likely saved both money and lives. (Vioxx was pulled off the market because it raised the risk of serious cardiovascular problems.)

Jerry Avorn, a Harvard doc who has been a long-time promoter and practitioner of academic detailing, will explain that it “is not a ‘Just Say No To Drugs’ program,” According to his prepared testimony. “It begins with the assumptions that prescribing is one of the most useful and challenging things we doctors do, and that we doctors crave accessible, unbiased data about the drugs we prescribe. If war is too important to be left to the generals, then drug information is too important to be left primarily to the pharmaceutical industry.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909