corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1313

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Government "discusses" drug safety with corporation
Monday Magazine 2003 Jun 25


Full text:

According to a statement from Jill McKinlay, a Toronto spokesperson for the transnational drug company that makes the anti-depressant Paxil, “GlaxoSmithKline Inc. is in discussions with Health Canada regarding proposed updates to the prescribing information for Paxil in pediatric patients.”

The drug has been the subject of intense media scrutiny in Britain, where the prime minister’s office issued a warning a few weeks ago against prescribing it to children due to an elevated risk of suicidal thoughts and self-harm. Health Canada is yet to warn Canadian physicians about the risks.

“They’re sitting down and negotiating a warning with the company,” says Victoria drug policy researcher Alan Cassels. If it was a question about safe tires, for example, he says the company wouldn’t be involved in discussing how to warn the public. “It’s not appropriate.”

There were 3.5 million prescriptions dispensed for Paxil in 2002, making it the ninth most prescribed drug in Canada and the top anti-depressant. Around 35,000 of those prescriptions would have gone to children. Two out of three recipients are women.

Health Canada spokesperson Ryan Baker says the government needs to talk with the company because the company owns the data on the drug. “Typically when Health Canada reviews the safety of a drug it will often involve talking with the manufacturer.”

Asked if the government’s slowness to act is putting Canadians at risk, he says, “I don’t want to speculate, but I know health professionals who prescribe anti-depressants are typically up to date on the latest information.”

GlaxoSmithKline spent $4,196,000 in 2002 promoting Paxil to prescribers, says Cassels, and distributed 511,000 free samples—don’t forget it’s addictive—to Canadian physicians.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909