corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1312

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Regush N.
Shame On You, American Medical Association
Red Flags 2003 Jun 18
http://web.archive.org/web/20071014161434/http://www.redflagsweekly.com/second_opinion_m.html


Full text:

Hey American Medical Association, lighten up!

This silly business about not allowing drug company representatives to sit in when doctors examine their patients…Get real.

It’s been going on for some time. Why the sudden need to criticize the practice? So what’s so bad about Dr. Joe examining Mrs. Smith’s rectum while a rep from a drug manufacturer looks on? These reps need to learn how a doctor handles a patient. And now, the big bad AMA is going to take this tradition, this educational tool, this marvelous opportunity to share intimacy, away from honorable people.

The AMA has adopted its first policy on “shadowing,” opposing the old practice of letting the rep sit in. Shame. The AMA, true to its calling, should have gone the extra mile on this issue and requested all of its members to even allow drug company reps to accompany patients to the bathroom when they produce urine or stool samples. The rep would thereby get first-hand information about how these valuable tests are conducted.
Furthermore, I would imagine that drug company reps, particularly those with a high learning curve and a sharp keenness, would even appreciate the opportunity to take over the full examination of the patient. What’s the big deal of taking, say, blood pressure, or sticking a thermometer into someone’s mouth, or elsewhere (such as under the arm). And what’s the big deal about consulting with the patient about the right drug that can be taken to alleviate symptoms. The rep knows more than the doctor about drugs, right?

And why stop there? Reps have been known to watch surgeries in progress and autopsies, and there must also be some interest in spending time, days on end, with people dying in intensive care units or, hell, even in wards that are quarantined against some new, mysterious emerging disease.

I’ll bet that those doctors, who up to this point have been receiving payments from drug reps to watch them in action, might be willing to allow them, for a much bigger fee, to take over the office for an entire day, maybe even a week. That way, there would be no mistake about patients receiving the correct medications.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909