corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13117

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Goldstein S.
Glaxo escapes prosecution on Seroxat disclosure
MarketWatch 2008 Mar 6
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/glaxo-escapes-prosecution-depression-drug/story.aspx?guid=%7B3689F3DC-6EE8-4750-ADAC-B65AFFA63833%7D


Full text:

LONDON (MarketWatch) — Britain’s top drug regulator Thursday chided GlaxoSmithKline for not quickly releasing data on increased suicidal risk in patients under 18 who used its Seroxat antidepressant drug, but declined to press criminal charges.

After four years of investigation and poring over one million pages of evidence, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said there wasn’t a “realistic” prospect that it could get a criminal conviction against GlaxoSmithKline.

The regulator said the law at the time — 2003 — wasn’t clear enough. In particular, the MHRA said the rules for disclosing data on drug use outside of its license were too muddy to win a prosecution.

Drugmakers seek “indications” for particular use — in Seroxat’s instance, for treating depression in adults — but often those drugs are prescribed legally for alternative uses, or so-called “off-label” use.

Up to 8,000 patients under 18 years of age were taking Seroxat — called Paxil in the U.S. — for depression, the regulator said.

Laws have subsequently been changed to require drugmakers to report adverse reactions in any clinical trial. However, these rules don’t apply outside of Europe, and most of Glaxo’s trials on Seroxat were conducted in the United States.

The MHRA said it will press for a law change in the U.K. and eventually Europe to force drugmakers to report adverse clinical data no matter where trials are conducted.

But the regulator did criticize GlaxoSmithKline in the report.

“I remain concerned that GSK could and should have reported this information earlier than they did,” Kent Woods, MHRA chief executive, said in a statement.

GlaxoSmithKline defended itself, pointing out — as the MHRA accepts — that the data linking increased suicidal risk to those under 18 comes from a study of the trials collectively and not from any one trial.

“When reviewed individually, none of these trials were considered by GSK or independent investigators to show a clinically meaningful increase in the rate of suicidal thinking or attempted suicide,” the company said.

“As has been confirmed by the MHRA in their conclusions, it was only when all the data became available, at the end of the research program, and were analyzed together … [that] an increased rate of suicidal thinking or attempted suicide [was] revealed in those pediatric patients taking Seroxat.”

Shares in the drugmaker fell 1.3% in London afternoon trade.

Seroxat and Paxil sales totaled 553 million pounds ($1.1 billion) last year, down 6% in constant-currencies terms.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909