corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13116

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Editorial .
Drug maker under fire - Alaska court case shows the danger of industries policing themselves
Las Vegas Sun 2008 Mar 8
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/mar/08/drug-maker-under-fire/


Full text:

Last week lawyers for Alaska testified that drug maker Eli Lilly concealed information that a popular schizophrenia drug caused side effects that include diabetes.

As a result, Alaska is suing the pharmaceutical company for the costs associated with treating Medicaid patients who the state says developed diabetes after taking Zyprexa.

About 23 million people have taken the drug since it was introduced in 1996. Lilly already has paid about $1.2 billion to settle about 30,000 claims from patients who say Zyprexa caused them to develop such problems as diabetes and weight gain, The New York Times reports.

But the case that opened in an Alaska state court Wednesday is the first Zyprexa case to go before a jury, the Times reports. And it is one that other states are watching. If the jury decides that Lilly executives did knowingly hide the existence of potential side effects, prosecutors in other states are likely to pursue similar cases and demand larger amounts of money.

Lilly’s attorneys say the company has done nothing wrong and that Zyprexa has proved to be of significant help to people who suffer from mental illness. But Alaska’s lawyers say company memos show Lilly’s executives knew of – and deliberately downplayed – Zyprexa’s side effects soon after the drug was released a dozen years ago.

Drug makers, just like any other corporation, should be held liable for their actions if a jury finds misconduct. The larger issue, however, is that this case highlights, yet again, one of the reasons why the pharmaceutical industry deserves tougher scrutiny by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Consumers shouldn’t be guinea pigs for drug makers.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend