corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13073

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Brandes L.
Do some vitamins actually increase cancer risk?
Med News Express, CTV.ca 2008 Mar 4
http://healthblog.ctv.ca/blog/_archives/2008/3/4/3558651.html


Full text:

“Is it okay for me to take these?” is a common question my patients ask in the cancer clinic. “These” refer to the contents in the multiple jars they have just stacked on the desk for me to examine.

Not content to simply take a daily low-dose multivitamin (no problem with that as far as I am concerned), most have paid a tidy sum of money for combinations of high-dose vitamins, various other antioxidants, minerals and herbal products, all advertised to boost the immune system and fight cancer. After all, if a little bit of something is good for you, isn’t more even better?

To their consternation, based on the surprising results of several large clinical studies, it is becoming increasingly easy for me to say, “No”.

For example, in a study of over 77,000 people just published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, a significant association between the use of supplemental vitamin E and lung cancer in smokers was observed. According to the study’s lead researcher, Dr. Christopher Slatore, a 7% rise occurred for every 100 mg of the vitamin consumed daily. This translates into a 28% increased risk of lung cancer when 400 mg/day (the dose of vitamin E capsules sold in most stores) is taken for 10 years.

Unfortunately, this is not the only study linking a vitamin with an increased risk of cancer.

A widely-reported 2007 paper in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that, compared to non-users of vitamins, men who consumed multivitamins more than once daily, and especially those who took additional vitamin E, beta-carotene (converted to vitamin A in the body) or selenium, had a 32% increased risk of developing advanced prostate cancer and a 98% higher risk of dying from the disease. The added risk of multivitamins was highest in men with a family history of the disease.

The study also found a statistically significant increased risk of localized prostate cancer among heavy multivitamin users who took additional selenium, beta-carotene, or zinc supplements, or who had a positive family history of prostate cancer.

In addition to the prostate cancer findings, other researchers have reported that taking selenium daily increases the risk of recurrent non-melanoma skin cancer.

These studies appear to fly in the face of several previous reports suggesting a protective role of selenium and Vitamin E against cancer.

Indeed, a large Phase 3 clinical trial, called the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), involving 35,000 American and Canadian men, is currently studying whether these substances, alone or in combination, can decrease the incidence of prostate cancer!

What are we to believe? Can vitamins and supplements be both pro- and anti-cancer? The answer is almost certainly “yes”.

On the one hand, beta-carotene has been shown in many studies to protect against experimental cancers in the test tube and in rodents. A diet rich in beta-carotene-containing foods is believed to be beneficial and, indeed, essential, to human health. On the other hand, not one, but two large lung cancer prevention trials in smokers have shown that beta-carotene supplements significantly increase the risk of developing lung cancer, prompting the U.S. National Cancer Institute to declare on its website, “Beta-Carotene Supplements Confirmed as Harmful to Those at Risk for Lung Cancer”.

How can this be explained?

Perhaps substances such as beta-carotene, selenium and vitamin E, naturally occurring in food, or even supplemented in moderation as part of a healthy lifestyle (which includes not smoking!) can help decrease the risk of developing certain cancers over a lifetime. However, especially if consumed in higher than normal quantities by smokers with latent (undetected) cancer or, perhaps, by people at genetically high risk for developing prostate cancer, those same substances appear to be able to promote malignant growth.

Finally, what about Vitamin D, currently in fashion to prevent cancer, especially in northern latitudes like Canada, where sun exposure is minimal during the long winter?

While the relatively small studies to date appear promising, based on the emerging story of certain increased cancer risks with the other two fat-soluble vitamins (E and A), I wonder if bad news about vitamin D may not yet trickle in.

Time will tell. In the meantime, the balance of clinical evidence suggests that over-consumption of vitamins should be avoided.

As we say in medicine: “First, do no harm”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909