corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 13059

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Antidepressants barely better than placebos
New Scientist 2005 Jun 23
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/mental-health/mg18725096.000-antidepressants-barely-better-than-placebos.html


Full text:

IT’S time to bin antidepressants. They are no better than placebos and prevent people tackling the underlying causes of their depression. At least that’s the conclusion of the latest review of the evidence.

“People prescribed antidepressants are always going to think they can’t deal with problems themselves,” says Joanna Moncrieff of University College London. “We’re prescribing more antidepressants, but there’s no evidence they make people less depressed. We’re not stopping or reducing suicides, and nor are people increasingly getting back to work.”

In the British Medical Journal (vol 331, p 155), Moncrieff and Irving Kirsch of the University of Plymouth, UK, reviewed studies looking at the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as Prozac and Seroxat. They conclude that antidepressants are scarcely better than placebos.

Moncrieff claims that by manipulating the data, it is possible to inflate a tiny statistical difference into an apparently large effect. She says SSRIs should not be the first-line treatment for moderate or severe depression.

Most experts disagree, however. “While there is the alternative of psychotherapy for milder depressions, the evidence still favours antidepressants for the more severe forms,” says Anthony Mann of London’s Institute of Psychiatry.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.