corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1304

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Cure For The Common Cold
British Medical Journal 2003 Jun 21


Full text:

Clinical trials showed that ViroPharma’s anti-cold drug, pleconaril, was little better than a placebo in clinical trials, but that didn’t stop hundreds of newspapers from hyping it as a miracle cure. “It fell far short of what any rational person would call a cure,” observes Gary Schwitzer. “Yet hundreds of journalists called pleconaril just that – and more – in hundreds of news stories before the drug was ever submitted to the FDA for approval.
… Journalists used an array of superlative terms for the drug -cure, miracle, wonder drug, super drug, a medical first. It was described as ‘good news for physicians and their patients,’ ‘potentially huge,’ and as a treatment that ‘may drastically help relieve your misery.’ It was compared with the search for the Holy Grail and with man’s landing on the moon.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963