corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1294

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

New antibiotics 'could prove deadly'
BBC News 2003 Jun 16
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2994528.stm


Full text:

A new class of antibiotics offers massive benefits to today’s patients – but could place future generations in danger, say experts.

Some scientists say that the principle behind a new crop of drugs currently under development will make it far tougher for bugs to become resistant to them.

This is because they work in the same way as many of the methods which the body itself has always used to rid itself of bacterial infections.

But other researchers say that it is quite possible that bacteria will acquire resistance – and when they do, this will make life far more difficult, as our own defence mechanisms will be rendered far less potent.

Cuts and grazes

Even minor cuts and grazes will take far longer to heal, they warn, and could even progress to far more serious bacterial infections.

In addition, the researchers say, the body’s inability to keep down other types of bacteria could lead to a surge in chronic illnesses such as heart disease and cystic fibrosis.

The new family of drugs, called “Ramp” antimicrobials, are being developed in response to growing resistance to existing antibiotic drugs.

There are fears that virtually all drugs could be rendered far less effective as microbes evolve to dodge their attacks.

Infection risk

However Professor Graham Bell, from McGill University in Canada, warns that the new antibiotics pose “a serious and unprecedented” risk to public health.

He warns that regulatory authorities tend not to look many years ahead when deciding whether to grant licences to new drugs.

“They are poorly designed to detect even grave and highly probable risks to public health arising from the population biology of microbes.

“Instead of dismissing the possibility that widespread resistance will evolve, we should use the bitter experience that we have gained from conventional antibiotics to plan for it.”

Researchers are learning more about how bacteria manage to acquire resistance to the drugs designed to wipe them out.

Because they reproduce so often, genetic mutations arise frequently, and occasionally these will equip the bacterium better to resist antibiotics.

When antibiotics are given – particularly if a full course is not completed – this gives the resistant colonies a chance to get established and develop further resistance.

Research has shown that certain bacteria species can even exchange genetic material – possibly including resistance genes – from other species simply through close contact.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909