corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12847

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Keilthy P.
‘Superdrug’ advice is changed after tragic death
Camden New Journal 2008 Feb 14
http://www.thecnj.co.uk/camden/2008/021408/news021408_09.html


Full text:

GOVERNMENT guidelines on the safety of “superdrugs” taken by three millions Britons have been changed after an investigation into the death of a Hampstead private schoolmaster.
Statins – cholesterol-lowering drugs prescribed to those at risk of heart disease – will carry new leaflets warning of side-effects like those blamed in an inquest into the death of University College School housemaster Dr Allan Woolley, 52, last April.
Dr Woolley was killed by a train at North Wembley station, holding a despairing note which read: “Just burn my wretched body without ceremony.”
But after friends and family asked an inquest to examine the role played by statins in his death, the coroner’s jury rejected a suicide verdict and instead recorded that he suffered “psychic disturbances, a known side-effect of the drug simvastatin”.
Within weeks of being prescribed simvastatins for his higher than average cholesterol, diabetic Dr Woolley, a hugely popular and active chemistry teacher at the school for 27 years, suffered sleep loss, hallucinations, and blackouts.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which monitors drug safety, issued a new drug safety update last Thursday.
Yesterday (Wednesday), a spokeswoman for MHRA said that she could not confirm that Dr Woolley’s death had led to the change. However, the MHRAs details of adverse drug reaction figures show only one recent instance of psychic disturbances leading to death. Since that is known to be Dr Woolley, “it would be reasonable to come to that conclusion,” she said.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909