corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12824

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

NV Judge to Decide if Wyeth to Pay $134M
Yahoo Finance 2008 Feb 14
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080214/prempro_trial.html?.v=1


Abstract:

Reno Judge to Rule by Tues if Wyeth Must Pay $134M to 3 Nev Women


Full text:

A judge says he will decide by early next week whether to reduce a $134 million judgment a jury in Reno awarded three Nevada women after it decided drug maker Wyeth caused their breast cancer.
Washoe County District Court Judge Robert Perry said he’ll issue a ruling by Tuesday on the company’s motion to slash the award to less than $10 million.

A lawyer for Wyeth told the judge Thursday the damages awarded to the women in October is “an extreme aberration” — 30 times greater than juries awarded in four other similar cases.

A lawyer for the women said the judgment is less than 1 percent of Wyeth’s net worth of more than $14 billion. She said it is appropriate given that the company’s hormone replacement drug caused their ongoing pain and suffering.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963