corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12765

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Watson R.
European Commission opts against traffic light system for food labelling
BMJ 2008 Feb 9; 336:(7639):296
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/336/7639/296-a?etoc


Abstract:

The European Commission has tabled EU-wide legislation that will require all prepacked food to display key health and nutritional information clearly on the front of the package. However, a “traffic light” system of red, amber, or green labelling will not be adopted.

The proposal, which must now be approved by European Union governments and the European parliament, is part of the commission’s antiobesity strategy. It is also designed to update rules on food labelling first introduced 30 years ago.

Presenting the initiative, Markos Kyprianou, the European commissioner for health, said that food labels could have a big influence on consumers’ purchasing decisions. The proposal, he said, “aims to ensure that food labels carry the essential information in a clear and legible way, so that EU citizens are empowered to make balanced dietary choices.”

Mr Kyprianou said he had rejected the traffic light method of labelling, used by some UK retailers . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963