corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12742

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Loftus P.
US Prescriptions For Vytorin, Zetia Rebounded Last Week -Firm
CNN Money.com 2008 Feb 5
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200802051642DOWJONESDJONLINE000601_FORTUNE5.htm


Full text:

U.S. prescriptions for embattled cholesterol drugs Vytorin and Zetia rebounded last week, following two weeks of declines amid questions about their effectiveness, a drug-data vendor said Tuesday.

Total prescriptions for Vytorin, which is marketed by a joint venture of Merck & Co. (MRK) and Schering-Plough Corp. (SGP), rose about 8% to 343,346 in the week ended Feb. 1, compared with the previous week, according to Verispan, a Yardley, Pa., research firm.

Zetia prescriptions rose about 9% to 250,979 in the week ended Feb. 1, versus the previous week, Verispan said.

Results of a study known as “Enhance,” were released Jan. 14 and showed that Vytorin was no better than generic simvastatin in slowing artery-clogging despite reducing bad cholesterol to a greater degree. Vytorin is a single-tablet combination of simvastatin and Zetia.

The announcement sparked a firestorm of criticism of the companies’ handling of the study, which had been completed in 2006, particularly the long delay in releasing results. Members of Congress and some state officials have opened investigations into various aspects of the study. The companies have tried to defend their handling of the study.

Prescriptions for both drugs dropped sharply in the two weeks after the Enhance study came out. Even after last week’s rebound, prescription volumes were still about 13% to 15% lower than in the week before the negative study was released.

But Merck and Schering-Plough are hopeful that their efforts to stand behind both drugs will stave off further prescription erosion. The companies have emphasized that both drugs are effective in their FDA-approved uses, primarily to lower levels of bad cholesterol.

“We are very pleased with the progress we’ve seen in the most recent daily prescriptions,” Kenneth Frazier, president of global human health at Merck, told investors at a Merrill Lynch conference Tuesday. “We have seen a stabilization of the trends that we were seeing before.”

Frazier also said the company was doing its best to counter the widespread, negative publicity over the study. “We’re not sitting still,” he said. “Merck and Schering-Plough are actively engaged in helping physicians and patients more fully understand what Enhance actually means and what it doesn’t mean.”

Vytorin and Zetia had combined sales of $5.2 billion in 2007.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909