corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12723

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Rosenberg H, Allard D
Evidence for Caution: Women and statin use
: Women and Health Protection 2007 Jun
http://www.whp-apsf.ca/pdf/statinsEvidenceCaution.pdf


Abstract:

This paper investigates the evidence base for the use of statin therapy in women. Statins
are a class of prescription drugs designed to lower cholesterol. The leading statin drugs
are Lipitor (generic name atorvastatin), Crestor (rosuvastatin), Mevacor (lovastatin),
Pravacol (pravastatin), Zocor (simvastatin) and Lescol (fluvastatin). The research on this
issue is exceptionally complex and cannot be fully addressed in this short document. For
the purposes of this review, we explore three fields of inquiry:
1. Benefit: Key Issues in the Evaluation of Statin Benefit
• representation of women in primary and secondary prevention trials
• extrapolation of benefit from men
• cholesterol levels as a risk factor for coronary vascular disease in women
• other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors
• age and life stage
2. Safety: Key Issues in the Evaluation of Statin Safety
• general release of Serious Adverse Events data, total mortality, total
cardiovascular events, or incidence of cancer and disaggregation for women
• data from the Adverse Drug Reaction reporting system
• data on concomitant use of statins and hormonal drugs
• research on the prescription of statins for women of childbearing potential
(WOCBP); miscarriage, birth defects and breast-feeding
• vulnerability of women to exercise intolerance
• burden of care in relation to statin-impaired family members
3. Representation: Key Issues in the Evaluation of Information Representation
• conflict of interest (COI)
• marketing strategies and awareness campaigns
• representation of cardiac risk for women
• statistical representations including relative risk (RR), absolute risk (AR) and
number needed to treat (NTT)
Our review of these fields identifies a troubling disjuncture between the widespread use
of statin medication for women and the evidence base for that usage. What we found
instead was evidence for caution.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909