corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12722

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Generics are being held up by regulatory agencys, claims EGA
PharmaTimes 2008 Feb 1
http://www.pharmatimes.com/worldnews/article.aspx?id=12769&src=EWorldNews


Full text:

Copycat versions of branded medicines are not getting to doctors and patients as rapidly as they should because of delays at regulatory agencies, Europe’s generics drugmakers have claimed.

The European Generic medicines Association (EGA), during its annual regulatory and scientific affairs conference in Brussels, is again asking national authorities “to resolve their issues of resources to ensure the rapid and efficient approval” of marketing applications for new generic medicines.

Greg Perry, the EGA’s director general, praised “the enormous preparatory work” national regulators undertook to implement the new Decentralised Procedure (DCP) in November 2005, saying it is a major improvement to the older Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP). However he added that “the lack of sufficient resources available to the competent authorities has been identified as the main barrier for the industry and European consumers to benefit fully from this new procedure”.

Mr Perry added that “the situation today is even worse than last year, despite the repeated warnings and detailed suggestions for improving efficiency” offered by the EGA over the past two years. “It constitutes a significant obstacle to the introduction of the new generic medicines onto the European Union market”, he claimed.

The EGA said it acknowledges that certain member states, such as Germany, have taken steps to increase resources, “but not to the extent required to cope with the expanded workload resulting from the implementation of recent legislation”, such as assessment of paediatrics trials and transparency”.

To help alleviate the problem, Mr Perry suggested that the national agencies tighten the rules for allocating submission dates to avoid double booking, and to consider financial penalties for companies that fail to inform when an allocated date will not be used.

More importantly, Mr Perry concluded, the authorities must “cooperate more closely amongst themselves to increase the assessment capacity of all medicines agencies and to ensure the full recognition of assessments made by other member states”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909