corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12683

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Hopkins Tanne J.
NIH needs to raise oversight of conflicts of interest among researchers, report says
BMJ 2008 Feb 2; 336:(7638):235
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/336/7638/235?etoc


Abstract:

The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) is lax in checking for conflicts of interest among the researchers who receive billions of dollars in its grants, says a report by the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, the institutes’ parent agency.

It has recommended that grantee institutions report the nature of financial conflicts of interest and how they are managed to the NIH. The NIH has objected to that recommendation, however, saying that it should not have to take on that responsibility.

During the fiscal year 2007, the 24 institutes and centres gave more than $29.2bn (£14.7bn; 19.8bn) in research grants, 80% of which was distributed through about 50 000 competitive grants to more than 325 000 researchers at more than 3000 universities, medical schools, and other research institutions in the United States and abroad, the report says.

Although NIH policies require grantee

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.