corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12659

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Ricks D.
Boom in similar drug names fuels medicine mix-ups
Newsday.com 2008 Jan 29
http://www.newsday.com/news/health/ny-hsdrug0130,0,5434758.story


Full text:

Medication mix-ups have more than doubled since 2004, driven largely by a troubling proliferation of prescription drugs with confusingly similar names, according to a new report.

Examining records submitted by 870 hospitals to MEDMARX, a database run by the United States Pharmacopeia, researchers discovered glaring, and sometimes deadly, medication errors linked to sound-alike, look-alike medication names. USP is a nonprofit agency that sets standards on prescription and nonprescription drugs, working with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as well as pharmaceutical companies.

In the new report, its eighth assessment of medication errors, USP researchers found that 1.4 percent of the mistakes resulted in harm, including seven errors that may have caused or contributed to the deaths of patients.

The research implicated 1,470 different drugs in errors associated with brand or generic names that looked or sounded similar. From this data, USP compiled an even longer list of 3,170 pairs of names that look or sound alike. This total is nearly double the 1,750 pairs that USP identified in its 2004 analysis.

“This is a hallmark report that really has galvanized the health care community,” said Darrell Abernethy, chief science officer at USP. He said the list has doubled because of the increasing number of drugs that are approved. USP researchers reviewed more than 26,000 records, he said.

Abernethy added that errors from sound-alike, look-alike drug names are a problem that spans the entire health care industry. “Currently about 15,000 new error reports are generated each month and entered into the database, so this is indeed a very robust database,” he said.

The report revealed that a child who was seen in an emergency room was prescribed Zyprexa, a schizophrenia drug, instead of the allergy medication Zyrtec. The child was rushed back to the ER after fainting, at which time the mix-up was discovered, the USP report said.

“This report brings a new dimension to USP’s list of look-alike and/or sound-alike drug names by providing additional evidence about the many ways in which easily confused names can lead directly to medication errors,” said Diane Cousins, USP’s vice president for health care quality and information.

A similar survey by the FDA revealed that confusing drug nomenclature can have fatal consequences. In 2005, the agency reported an 8-year-old girl died after receiving methadone, a narcotic, instead of methylphenidate, an attention deficit medication. In another case, a 19-year-old man showed signs of potentially fatal complications after he was given clozapine, a drug for difficult-to-treat schizophrenia, instead of olanzapine, another type of schizophrenia drug.

With MEDMARX, hospitals participate anonymously and voluntarily. Because the database does not include every hospital in the United States, the number of actual medication errors is probably higher, USP researchers say.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909