corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12593

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Smulders YM, Thijs A.
[The influence of the pharmaceutical industry on treatment guidelines].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2007 Nov 3; 151:(44):2429-31
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18064860


Abstract:

The Dutch Health Care Inspectorate has issued a short report on the influence pharmaceutical companies may have on the development process of clinical treatment guidelines in The Netherlands. The Inspectorate concludes that virtually all opinion leaders are financially supported by pharmaceutical companies, and therefore, potential conflicts of interest are unavoidable. The Inspectorate recommends making these potential conflicts of interest more transparent by means of the full disclosure of all connections, in particular those related to funding, between guideline committee members and pharmaceutical companies. In addition, the Inspectorate suggests that formally allowing pharmaceutical companies the opportunity to comment on draft versions of a guideline may reduce other undesirable initiatives that influence guidelines. Additional means of regulating the influence of pharmaceutical companies should be considered. One such additional measure could be a qualitative and quantitative limit on conflicts of interest e.g. substantial personal income from pharmaceutical companies should preclude guideline committee membership. In addition, an independent review committee who would judge whether a guideline shows signs of interference by pharmaceutical companies may be considered.

Keywords:
Conflict of Interest Drug Industry* Financial Support Humans Interprofessional Relations* Physician's Practice Patterns* Practice Guidelines as Topic*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963