corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1256

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Zachry WM 3rd, Shepherd MD, Hinich MJ, Wilson JP, Brown CM, Lawson KA.
Relationship between direct-to-consumer advertising and physician diagnosing and prescribing.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002 Jan 1; 59:(1):42-9
http://www.ajhp.org/cgi/reprint/59/1/42


Abstract:

The relationships between direct-to-consumer advertising expenditures and the monthly frequencies of diagnoses and prescriptions written associated with the products advertised are examined. The analyses utilized quasi-experimental time-series techniques. Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and Competitive Media Reporting were used to calculate monthly levels of the dependent and independent variables. The dependent variables included monthly frequencies of diagnoses for the products’ FDA-approved indications, medications prescribed within the advertised pharmaceutical class, and medications prescribed for the specific advertised agent. The independent variables included monthly expenditures for advertising each pharmaceutical class and each specific agent. Several significant monthly relationships were found. The diagnoses of hyperlipidemia (p = 0.008) and the number of prescriptions written for antilipemics (p = 0.003) were positively associated with the advertising expenditure for antilipemics. The number of prescriptions written for Claritin (p = 0.004) and Zocor (p < 0.001) was positively related to the advertising expenditure for their respective pharmaceutical classes; the amount of prescriptions written for Hismanal (p = 0.007), Seldane (p < 0.001), and Zantac (p = 0.004) was negatively related to the advertising expenditure for their respective pharmaceutical classes. The number of prescriptions written for Claritin (p = 0.005) and Zocor (p < 0.001) was positively related to the advertising expenditure for each specific product; the amount of prescriptions written for Hismanal (p = 0.049) was negatively associated with the amount of money spent specifically advertising the agent. No significant associations were found in antihypertensive drugs and drugs to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy. The results of the analyses suggest that the direct-to-consumer advertising expenditure is associated with physician diagnosing and physician prescribing for certain drugs and drug classes.

Keywords:
Advertising/economics* Humans Physician's Practice Patterns/statistics & numerical data* Prescriptions, Drug/economics* Retrospective Studies United States time series United States DTCA direct-to-consumer advertising market share INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: MARKET SHARE PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING VOLUME OF AND EXPENDITURE ON PROMOTION


Notes:

Methodology note: This study looked at allergy, antilipemic and ulcer medications and the results may not be applicable to other groups of medications.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909