corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1247

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Baker CB, Johnsrud MT, Crismon ML, Rosenheck RA, Woods SW.
Quantitative analysis of sponsorship bias in economic studies of antidepressants.
Br J Psychiatry 2003 Dec; 183:498-506:
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/183/6/498


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Concern is widespread about potential sponsorship influence on research, especially in pharmacoeconomic studies. Quantitative analysis of possible bias in such studies is limited. AIMS: To determine whether there is an association between sponsorship and quantitative outcomes in pharmacoeconomic studies of antidepressants. METHOD: Using all identifiable articles with original comparative quantitative cost or cost-effectiveness outcomes for antidepressants, we performed contingency table analyses of study sponsorship and design v. study outcome. RESULTS: Studies sponsored by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) manufacturers favoured SSRIs over tricyclic antidepressants more than non-industry-sponsored studies. Studies sponsored by manufacturers of newer antidepressants favoured these drugs more than did non-industry-sponsored studies. Among industry-sponsored studies, modelling studies favoured the sponsor’s drug more than did administrative studies. Industry-sponsored modelling studies were more favourable to industry than were non-industry-sponsored ones. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacoeconomic studies of antidepressants reveal clear associations of study sponsorship with quantitative outcome.

Keywords:
Antidepressive Agents/economics* Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/economics Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use Biomedical Research/standards* Conflict of Interest Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods Drug Industry* Ethics, Research Financing, Organized/economics Humans Research Design/standards Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors/economics Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use Treatment Outcome

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend